On April 8, I was honored to speak at the Dies Librorum, a popular monthly event celebrating books and authors at the BOOK HAVEN, Salida Colorado, . Three other authors discussed their books that evening: Kristen Moeller, Davalyn Spencer and Bob Campbell. (For further information about Dies Librorum, contact Lisa Marvel at thebookhavenlisa@gmail.com)
Every time I speak about THE QUESTION. What Happened to the Animal-Human Spiritual Connection?, I share my hope: that readers of my book will accept the animals within their own spirituality. I define SPIRITUALITY as the fully developed persona of an individual -- including but not exclusive to -- that individual's religion. The answer to THE QUESTION lies within our our own true self. The QUESTION opens the door to a much greater story whereby we -- all animals -- are mere players in the vast infinite of existence.
EXCERPT. THE QUESTION. Chapter 13. That They Come Into Their Own.
The animals don’t have to be taught
who they are. They are what they
are. There is no discussion. The animals don’t have to surrender to
their own nature. They ARE their own nature. Being human, I have to think about it. Be taught who I am.
We
humans have been blessed and cursed with the ability to debate our own
questions. We demand unconditional
faith in our religions’ texts as well as our scientific views. We are too busy trying to prove our
myths. Maybe the “Tree of
Knowledge” portrayed in mythologies all over the world bore the fruits of
Knowing. “Knowledge” and “Knowing”
are two separate concepts. Awesome
concepts, but worlds apart. If the
mythological Tree of Knowledge bore fruits of Knowing, I am drawn to the idea
that Eve’s reputation was sacrificed for her knowing the Truth. Perhaps first Woman knew (if only
briefly) she was a conscious being dwelling among conscious life forms in a
conscious Universe. She excitedly
shared the knowledge with her alter ego, first Man. As they talked over the meaning of her discovery, they
became confused. Then were
afraid. Their doubts separated
them from the essence of who they were and from each other. With that, Eden was lost. #
Forty years ago, Seth, as channeled by Jane Roberts, explained it this way:
May 3, 1976 Session 774. "In early times we merged our Consciousness with Nature… In
those early times, then, consciousness was more mobile… A person looking
out into the world of trees, waters and rock, wildlife
and vegetation, literally felt that he or she was looking at the
larger, materialized, subjective areas of personal selfhood. To explore the exterior world was to
explore the inner one.
"...Such a person, however, walking
through the forest, also felt that he or she was also a portion of the inner
life of each rock or tree materialized. Yet there was no
contradiction of identities.
"A man might merge his
own consciousness with a running stream, traveling in such a way for miles
to explore the layout of the land. To do this
he became part water in a kind of identification you can
barely understand -- but so did the water then become part of the man…"
May 17, 1976. Session 776. "Take
the English sentence: “I observe the tree.” If that
original language had words, the equivalent would be: “As a
tree, I observe myself or “Taking on my tree nature, I rest in
my shade.” or even, “From my man nature, I rest in the
shade of my tree nature.”
"A man did not so much stand at the
shore looking down at the water, as he immersed his consciousness within
it. ...Man would never have said “the water flows through my
valley.” Instead, the sentence would have read something like
this: “running over the rocks, my water self flows
together with others in slippery union.”...
" …
Man did not designate his own as the only kind of consciousness by any
means. He graciously thanked the tree that gave him shade,
for example, and he understood that the tree retained its own identity
even when it allowed his awareness to join with it.
(Note: The entire collection of Seth materials is found in the Yale University Library archives.)
No comments:
Post a Comment